In response to a Rs100 million claim of Veena Malik, FHM India has counter sued the actor with a claim of Rs250 million.
In addition, FHM claims that it was Veena, who had approached the magazine to do the "very sexy, bold and in-your-face shoot." It claims, Veena, via photographer Mr Vishal Saxena, contacted the magazine in October 2011 to do the cover shot. In the notice sent to Veena Malik, FHM has claimed a damage worth Rs. 250 million and asked her to apologize for fabricating false claims against the magazine.
Earlier, Veena Malik had send a legal notice to the publisher for ‘morphing her photos’ to look like she had posed nude for the magazine’s December issue cover. The magazine has denied the claim and has told that they have a video of the event to prove she had posed nude for the photo session.
The scandal started when the magazine revealed the December edition cover featuring Veena without any cloth and an ISI tattoo on her arm. Later, another version of the cover is being featured in the magazine website in which, Veena is wearing hot pants and a broad belt and no clothes on the upper parts of her body (image).
Regarding the ISI tattoo on he arms, FHM India‘s editor Kabeer Sharma says that she was well aware of the concept and she liked the idea. Mr. Sharma told that he has email evidences on the approval of the design of the cover photo.
Veena’s legal notice says a different story, "After the completion of the shoot, our client was shown the four images with the clothes. The photo in which she has posed with her tattoo on her hand was taken with a bikini and/or a thong which was worn by our client and also with hot pants and a broad belt.”
According to Veena’s legal notice the photo session was held on November 23, 2011 and, "no nude photographs taken nor were there any of video shots taken …"
Veena Malik is also told to be the Pakistani version of Rakhi Sawant, a controversial Indian actress and vj.
Incoming search terms:
- veena malik hot mujra without clothes