scandal


In an interview with BBC, Veena Malik has finally admitted that she was not wearing anything on the top portion of her body and was only covering it by her arms. Here is what Veena has to say:

"I was not naked at all. I was was wearing a bikini, and then the other portions of the body, I was like…  was covered with my arms, and above all that, they were supposed to cover the other portions of my body with the tattoos. They actually did not."

veena_bbc_interview

The interviewer made it clear by asking if she were topless and only wearing bikini bottom. To which Veena told:

(more…)

Incoming search terms:

scandal


In response to a Rs100 million claim of Veena Malik, FHM India has counter sued the actor with a claim of Rs250 million. 

In addition, FHM claims that it was Veena, who had approached the magazine to do the "very sexy, bold and in-your-face shoot." It claims, Veena, via photographer Mr Vishal Saxena, contacted the magazine in October 2011 to do the cover shot. In the notice sent to Veena Malik, FHM has claimed a damage worth Rs. 250 million and asked her to apologize for fabricating false claims against the magazine.

veena_mallik

Earlier, Veena Malik had send a legal notice to the publisher for ‘morphing her photos’ to look like she had posed nude for the magazine’s December issue cover. The magazine has denied the claim and has told that they have a video of the event to prove she had posed nude for the photo session.

The scandal started when the magazine revealed the December edition cover featuring Veena without any cloth and an ISI tattoo on her arm. Later, another version of the cover is being featured in the magazine website in which, Veena is wearing hot pants and a broad belt and no clothes on the upper parts of her body (image). 

(more…)

Incoming search terms: